Cruise: 49UF20090610 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks200906; ks200906; 49UF20090610; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09, P13;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2019!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:1
nitrate:14
oxygen:15
ph:3
phosphate:14
salinity:15
silicate:14
tco2:8
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HH19910813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20090610 - salinity
Huge uncertainty in the individual crossover results. Nonetheless, more than 90%
of the weighted mean offsets are within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20000620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20070606_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20090610 - tco2
All crossovers indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:18:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20090610 - ph
Only two significant crossovers but both strongly indicate a too high pH value.
The interconsistency check (type 3) confirms the findings - however using the
same two cruises for the calculated TA crossover analysis….
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:21:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - phosphate
The great majority of the offsets falls within the 2% range. No clear consensus
on any bias within that range. Given the uncertainty and limited depth I would
not suggest a small adjustment anyway. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20090610 - nitrate
All crossovers but the ones from 32201992 and 49UP20060607 have offsets within
the acceptable range. However, only "shallow" data is given and further do most
UF & UP crossovers have higher (1%) concentrations. Roughly 10% of the
crossovers have offsets below 1. Not enough evidence for an adjustment within
the limits.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20090610 - phosphate
The great majority of the offsets falls within the 2% range. No clear consensus
on any bias within that range. Given the uncertainty and limited depth I would
not suggest a small adjustment anyway. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20090610 - silicate
The great majority of the offsets falls within the 2% range. Only one cruise
shows slightly lower values all other indicate too low concentrations. However,
given the uncertainty and limited depth I do not suggest an adjustment below 2%.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:20:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HH19910813_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20010604_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20071008_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20040120_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20050615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20090610 - oxygen
This cruise has only relatively shallow data. Based on other crossover analyses
in this area it is known that the "upper" water column is very variable
especially for oxygen. Based on this I would only suggest an adjustment for a
very clear offset. This isn't the case even though the total weighted mean is
slightly above 1.01. Note the extreme standard deviations of the individual
offsets. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:18:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 8 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20090610 - ph
Only two significant crossovers but both strongly indicate a too high pH value.
The interconsistency check (type 3) confirms the findings - however using the
same two cruises for the calculated TA crossover analysis….
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:21:00 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - silicate
The great majority of the offsets falls within the 2% range. Only one cruise
shows slightly lower values all other indicate too low concentrations. However,
given the uncertainty and limited depth I do not suggest an adjustment below 2%.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:20:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - salinity
Huge uncertainty in the individual crossover results. Nonetheless, more than 90%
of the weighted mean offsets are within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - phosphate
The great majority of the offsets falls within the 2% range. No clear consensus
on any bias within that range. Given the uncertainty and limited depth I would
not suggest a small adjustment anyway. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - nitrate
All crossovers but the ones from 32201992 and 49UP20060607 have offsets within
the acceptable range. However, only "shallow" data is given and further do most
UF & UP crossovers have higher (1%) concentrations. Roughly 10% of the
crossovers have offsets below 1. Not enough evidence for an adjustment within
the limits.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:19:13 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - oxygen
This cruise has only relatively shallow data. Based on other crossover analyses
in this area it is known that the "upper" water column is very variable
especially for oxygen. Based on this I would only suggest an adjustment for a
very clear offset. This isn't the case even though the total weighted mean is
slightly above 1.01. Note the extreme standard deviations of the individual
offsets. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:18:43 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - tco2
All crossovers indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 11:18:07 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20090610 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09, P13; Carbon PI:Shiya Minato; Hydrography
PI:Tatsushi Shiga; Oxygen PI:Tatsushi Shiga; Nutrients PI:Tatsushi Shiga;
Organic PI:Hidekazu Matsueda; Carbon Isotope PI:Hidekazu Matsueda
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments