Cruise: 49UF20100615 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201005; ks201005; 49UF20100615; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2019!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:5
cruise:1
nitrate:11
oxygen:11
ph:4
phosphate:11
salinity:11
silicate:11
tco2:5
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20050114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20070606_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20100615 - salinity
Extreme uncertainty in the individual offsets. This makes a robust statement
impossible. However, the profiles seem to fit well to other cruises. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20040114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20100615 - tco2
All 4 crossovers agree well and have an offset of about 3. However, the large
standard deviations and the limited number of significant crossovers are not
enough evidence for an adjustment within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:40:58 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20100615 - alkalinity
4 significant crossovers, all show acceptable offsets with large uncertainties.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:40:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20100615 - phosphate
The great majority of the crossovers falls within the 2% range. The standard
deviations are of the same order though. Note that many UP cruises have an
offset above or around 1.01. Nonetheless, clearly no need for an adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - ph
Three crossovers indicate a too low pH-value, the standard deviations are of the
order of +/- 0.007 though. The interconsistency check (type 2 ) shows an "ok"
match (offset by 0.0053). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:38:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20050114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20070606_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20100615 - nitrate
All but two offsets clearly within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20050114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20070606_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20100615 - phosphate
The great majority of the crossovers falls within the 2% range. The standard
deviations are of the same order though. Note that many UP cruises have an
offset above or around 1.01. Nonetheless, clearly no need for an adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20050114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20070606_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20100615 - silicate
All offsets are within the acceptable range (only two slightly below 1). The
standard deviations are almost of the same order though. Note that most cruises
have an offset above or around 1.01. Nonetheless, no need for an adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080617_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20050114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20070606_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20100615 - oxygen
Extreme uncertainty in the individual offsets. This makes a robust statement
impossible. However, the profiles seem to fit well to other cruises. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:40:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20100615 - tco2
All 4 crossovers agree well and have an offset of about 3. However, the large
standard deviations and the limited number of significant crossovers are not
enough evidence for an adjustment within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:40:58 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - alkalinity
4 significant crossovers, all show acceptable offsets with large uncertainties.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:40:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - oxygen
Extreme uncertainty in the individual offsets. This makes a robust statement
impossible. However, the profiles seem to fit well to other cruises. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:40:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - nitrate
All but two offsets clearly within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:59 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - phosphate
The great majority of the crossovers falls within the 2% range. The standard
deviations are of the same order though. Note that many UP cruises have an
offset above or around 1.01. Nonetheless, clearly no need for an adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - salinity
Extreme uncertainty in the individual offsets. This makes a robust statement
impossible. However, the profiles seem to fit well to other cruises. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:26 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - silicate
All offsets are within the acceptable range (only two slightly below 1). The
standard deviations are almost of the same order though. Note that most cruises
have an offset above or around 1.01. Nonetheless, no need for an adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:39:06 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - ph
Three crossovers indicate a too low pH-value, the standard deviations are of the
order of +/- 0.007 though. The interconsistency check (type 2 ) shows an "ok"
match (offset by 0.0053). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-06 12:38:44 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20100615 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13; Carbon PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Hydrography
PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Oxygen PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Nutrients PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Organic
PI:Masao Ishii; Carbon Isotope PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments