Cruise: 49UF20110205 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201102; ks201102; 49UF20110205; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13,P04;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2019!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:5
cruise:1
nitrate:13
oxygen:13
ph:4
phosphate:13
salinity:13
silicate:13
tco2:4
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20070216_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20050118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20040114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20110205 - salinity
Very uncertain crossover results due to the limited depth. The more robust
offsets indicate good accuracy though. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:24:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20110205 - tco2
Extreme uncertainties in all three crossovers (standard deviations of about +/-
5) making a robust statement impossible. However, data fits ok to RY2011 as do
the other carbonate parameters. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:22:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20110205 - alkalinity
All four crossovers have a negative offset - varying between -1 up to - 9 even
if (roughly) the same stations are compared. The most recent cruise RY2011 has
the smallest offset. Note that the cruise has no data deeper than 2300m limiting
the crossover quality. Given the high uncertainty and that the weighted mean is
only slightly below -4, maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:22:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
322019920816_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20110205 - ph
Only three crossovers and all of them indicate clearly a too low pH value
(absolute offset of -0.015). This is only partially confirmed by the additional
interconsistency check (type 2) with an offset of -0.005. Keep in mind the
uncertainty of TA, i.e. adjust to fit well with RY2011.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:24:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - phosphate
There is quite a large variability in the crossover results. The majority of the
cruises (mostly UF and UP cruises) shows a slight positive offset capped to
roughly 2%. Nonetheless other crossovers (especially with NZ cruises) show also
offsets around 0.98. All in all maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20070216_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20050118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20040114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20110205 - nitrate
All(!) but one offset clearly within the acceptable range. Accurate data,
maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20070216_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20050118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20040114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20110205 - phosphate
There is quite a large variability in the crossover results. The majority of the
cruises (mostly UF and UP cruises) shows a slight positive offset capped to
roughly 2%. Nonetheless other crossovers (especially with NZ cruises) show also
offsets around 0.98. All in all maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20070216_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20050118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20040114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20110205 - silicate
All(!) Offsets are clearly within the acceptable range. Less than 10% of the
offsets are below 1. Nonetheless, accurate data as the rest is close to 1.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:24:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG20000912_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20070216_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY20110515_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20050118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20060118_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20040114_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20110205 - oxygen
Very uncertain crossover results due to the limited depth. The more robust
offsets indicate good accuracy though. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20110205 - ph
Only three crossovers and all of them indicate clearly a too low pH value
(absolute offset of -0.015). This is only partially confirmed by the additional
interconsistency check (type 2) with an offset of -0.005. Keep in mind the
uncertainty of TA, i.e. adjust to fit well with RY2011.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:24:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - silicate
All(!) Offsets are clearly within the acceptable range. Less than 10% of the
offsets are below 1. Nonetheless, accurate data as the rest is close to 1.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:24:30 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - salinity
Very uncertain crossover results due to the limited depth. The more robust
offsets indicate good accuracy though. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:24:08 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - phosphate
There is quite a large variability in the crossover results. The majority of the
cruises (mostly UF and UP cruises) shows a slight positive offset capped to
roughly 2%. Nonetheless other crossovers (especially with NZ cruises) show also
offsets around 0.98. All in all maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:52 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - nitrate
All(!) but one offset clearly within the acceptable range. Accurate data,
maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - oxygen
Very uncertain crossover results due to the limited depth. The more robust
offsets indicate good accuracy though. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:23:11 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - alkalinity
All four crossovers have a negative offset - varying between -1 up to - 9 even
if (roughly) the same stations are compared. The most recent cruise RY2011 has
the smallest offset. Note that the cruise has no data deeper than 2300m limiting
the crossover quality. Given the high uncertainty and that the weighted mean is
only slightly below -4, maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:22:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - tco2
Extreme uncertainties in all three crossovers (standard deviations of about +/-
5) making a robust statement impossible. However, data fits ok to RY2011 as do
the other carbonate parameters. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 14:22:28 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20110205 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P13,P04; Carbon PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Hydrography
PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Oxygen PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Nutrients PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Carbon
Isotope PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments