Cruise: 49UF20120826 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201207; ks201207; 49UF20120826; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2019!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:3
cruise:1
nitrate:11
oxygen:11
ph:3
phosphate:10
salinity:11
silicate:10
tco2:3
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20120826 - salinity
There are very strong variations in the results of the individual crossovers. It
is striking though that the 6 crossovers with a relatively small standard
deviation, i.e. the ones with deep samples, have offsets within the acceptable
range. Further reduces the offsets with depth. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20120826 - tco2
Only two crossovers of questionable quality are present. Both indicate slightly
too high concentrations but note the large standard deviations. This is not
enough for a robust conclusion.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:30:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20120826 - alkalinity
Only two crossovers of questionable Quality are present. Both indicate slightly
too low concentrations but note the large standard deviations. This is not
enough for a robust conclusion.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:31:10 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20120826 - ph
Only two significant crossovers, but both (as the less significant crossovers)
indicate a too low value. Note the large standard deviations though. Also does
the interconsistency check (type 2) rather indicate a too high value..... This
is not enough for a robust conclusion especially as TA and TCO2 data cannot be
2nd Qced too.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:33:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - phosphate
All(!) offsets are within the 2% range. The absolute mean is also very close to
1. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20120826 - nitrate
All (27) crossovers have offsets within the acceptable range. Note that only
few crossovers have reliable "deep" comparisons which is also reflected in the
large standard deviations of most offsets. Nonetheless, data seems acceptable
even if the concentrations are mabye a little bit too high (e.g. UF2008).
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20120826 - phosphate
All(!) offsets are within the 2% range. The absolute mean is also very close to
1. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20120826 - silicate
All offsets have values above 1, however none of them is very certain as the
standard deviations are at least of the order +/- 0.1. Maybe 1% too high
concentrations but not enough significant evidence to justify such a small
adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20120826 - oxygen
There are very strong variations in the results of the individual crossovers. It
is striking though that the 6 crossovers with a relatively small standard
deviation, i.e. the ones with deep samples, have offsets close to 1 (except
RY1995). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:31:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 9 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20120826 - ph
Only two significant crossovers, but both (as the less significant crossovers)
indicate a too low value. Note the large standard deviations though. Also does
the interconsistency check (type 2) rather indicate a too high value..... This
is not enough for a robust conclusion especially as TA and TCO2 data cannot be
2nd Qced too.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:33:31 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - silicate
All offsets have values above 1, however none of them is very certain as the
standard deviations are at least of the order +/- 0.1. Maybe 1% too high
concentrations but not enough significant evidence to justify such a small
adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - salinity
There are very strong variations in the results of the individual crossovers. It
is striking though that the 6 crossovers with a relatively small standard
deviation, i.e. the ones with deep samples, have offsets within the acceptable
range. Further reduces the offsets with depth. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:36 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - phosphate
All(!) offsets are within the 2% range. The absolute mean is also very close to
1. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - nitrate
All (27) crossovers have offsets within the acceptable range. Note that only
few crossovers have reliable "deep" comparisons which is also reflected in the
large standard deviations of most offsets. Nonetheless, data seems acceptable
even if the concentrations are mabye a little bit too high (e.g. UF2008).
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:32:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - oxygen
There are very strong variations in the results of the individual crossovers. It
is striking though that the 6 crossovers with a relatively small standard
deviation, i.e. the ones with deep samples, have offsets close to 1 (except
RY1995). Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:31:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - alkalinity
Only two crossovers of questionable Quality are present. Both indicate slightly
too low concentrations but note the large standard deviations. This is not
enough for a robust conclusion.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:31:10 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - tco2
Only two crossovers of questionable quality are present. Both indicate slightly
too high concentrations but note the large standard deviations. This is not
enough for a robust conclusion.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:30:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20120826 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto;
Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients PI:Kazuhiro
Nemoto; Organic PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments