Cruise: 49UF20121024 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019 Successor: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: ks201208; ks201208; 49UF20121024; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN, JS;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment version is immutable and published in GLODAPv2.2019! Click here to switch to new version (GLODAPv2.2019)
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View | ||
tracer.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:3
cfc11:1
cfc12:1
cruise:2
nitrate:12
oxygen:12
ph:3
phosphate:11
salinity:12
silicate:12
tco2:4
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UF20121024 - salinity
There are only few crossovers which compare deep samples, hence the great
variety of offsets. Most crossovers with an acceptable standard deviation, e.g.
RY1994, UP2010 indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:45:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UF20121024 - tco2
Only three significant crossovers are present which are based on only "shallow"
samples. Maybe there is a bias with too high concentrations (not confirmed by
less significant crossovers), but there is not enough information for a robust
2nd QC/adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:43:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UF20121024 - alkalinity
Adjusted following RG meeting and additional Japanese Sea revision.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 12:51:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20121024 - alkalinity
Only two significant crossovers which are based on only "shallow" samples, hence
the large standard deviations. Not enough for a robust 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:43:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UF20121024 - ph
Crossovers are far from reliable… further no clear bias can be detected from the
interconsistency check (type 2).
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:46:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - phosphate
Only three crossovers with significant deep comparisons (>2500m) are present.
All of those have offsets close to 0.99. The other crossovers confirm this small
offset. Still, I am not confident enough for such a small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UF20121024 - nitrate
Only three crossovers with significant deep comparisons (>2500m). All of those
have offsets close to 1. All other crossovers (minimum depth of 1500m) confirm
this. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UF20121024 - phosphate
Only three crossovers with significant deep comparisons (>2500m) are present.
All of those have offsets close to 0.99. The other crossovers confirm this small
offset. Still, I am not confident enough for such a small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UF20121024 - silicate
All but one offset are clearly within the acceptable range. Even though the
majority of the crossovers is limited in depth the agremeent leads to confidence
about the good accuracy. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:45:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49K619960620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49SH20081021_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UF20121024 - oxygen
There are only few crossovers which compare deep samples, hence the great
variety of offsets. Anyway, it can be seen that the offsets diminish towards
greater depths. Most crossovers with an acceptable standard deviation, e.g.
RY1994, UP2010 indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
CFC-12-saturation.png | View |
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc12 in subject)
49UF20121024 - cfc12
There are only three stations for which a surface saturation ratio can be
calculated. These show quite a large variability but all within +/- 6% around
the equilibrium. The fit with CFC_11 data is based on a fair amount of samples
and nicely follows the prediction. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:46:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
CFC-11-saturation.png | View |
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc11 in subject)
49UF20121024 - cfc11
There are only three station for which a surface saturation ratio can be
calculated. These show a slight oversaturaton just on the 5% upper limit. The
fit with CFC_12 data is based on a fair amount of samples and also indicates a
5% oversaturation. Given the limited amount of data, maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:46:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
View 12 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UF20121024 - alkalinity
Adjusted following RG meeting and additional Japanese Sea revision.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2020-06-10 12:51:51 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UF20121024 - cfc12
There are only three stations for which a surface saturation ratio can be
calculated. These show quite a large variability but all within +/- 6% around
the equilibrium. The fit with CFC_11 data is based on a fair amount of samples
and nicely follows the prediction. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:46:49 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - cfc11
There are only three station for which a surface saturation ratio can be
calculated. These show a slight oversaturaton just on the 5% upper limit. The
fit with CFC_12 data is based on a fair amount of samples and also indicates a
5% oversaturation. Given the limited amount of data, maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:46:22 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - ph
Crossovers are far from reliable… further no clear bias can be detected from the
interconsistency check (type 2).
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:46:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - silicate
All but one offset are clearly within the acceptable range. Even though the
majority of the crossovers is limited in depth the agremeent leads to confidence
about the good accuracy. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:45:45 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - salinity
There are only few crossovers which compare deep samples, hence the great
variety of offsets. Most crossovers with an acceptable standard deviation, e.g.
RY1994, UP2010 indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:45:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - phosphate
Only three crossovers with significant deep comparisons (>2500m) are present.
All of those have offsets close to 0.99. The other crossovers confirm this small
offset. Still, I am not confident enough for such a small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:55 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - nitrate
Only three crossovers with significant deep comparisons (>2500m). All of those
have offsets close to 1. All other crossovers (minimum depth of 1500m) confirm
this. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:32 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - oxygen
There are only few crossovers which compare deep samples, hence the great
variety of offsets. Anyway, it can be seen that the offsets diminish towards
greater depths. Most crossovers with an acceptable standard deviation, e.g.
RY1994, UP2010 indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:44:17 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - alkalinity
Only two significant crossovers which are based on only "shallow" samples, hence
the large standard deviations. Not enough for a robust 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:43:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - tco2
Only three significant crossovers are present which are based on only "shallow"
samples. Maybe there is a bias with too high concentrations (not confirmed by
less significant crossovers), but there is not enough information for a robust
2nd QC/adjustment.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-18 16:43:41 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
49UF20121024 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P03; Section:OK, PN, JS; Carbon PI:Kazuhiro
Nemoto; Hydrography PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Oxygen PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Nutrients
PI:Kazuhiro Nemoto; Organic PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019
Hide comments