Cruise: 49UP20090916 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf200909; rf200909; 49UP20090916; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09; Section:PT;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2019!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
cruise:1
nitrate:12
oxygen:12
ph:11
phosphate:12
salinity:12
silicate:11
tco2:4
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19990804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20000105_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20060630_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20090916 - salinity
The uncertainty is too high to give any robust conclusion. Nonetheless, the
absolute weighted mean is within the acceptable range and the (a bit) more
reliable crossovers, e.g. UP2010 ,too.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:18:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20000620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20090916 - tco2
Only 3 crossovers present. All of them indicate too high concentrations but all
share large uncertainties too (order of +/- 10)! Further, the high offsets
result mostly because of one profile with high concentrations. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:16:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20050419_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20071023_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20040704_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20070724_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20090916 - ph
All offsets have standard deviations in the order of 0.025, i.e. no real
conclusion can be drawn form these. Further, only one significant crossover for
the calculated TA data is given, i.e. no robust interconsistency check (type 3)
can be made. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:18:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - phosphate
The great majority of the offsets is within the acceptable range. Further,
strong variations and the uncertainty are striking. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG19990804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20000105_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20060630_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20090916 - nitrate
The great majority of the offsets is within the acceptable range. Most
crossovers have a weighted mean offset of above 1.01 though. Nonetheless, the
uncertainty is quite high due to the shallow data, i.e. high standard
deviations. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19990804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20000105_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20060630_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20090916 - phosphate
The great majority of the offsets is within the acceptable range. Further,
strong variations and the uncertainty are striking. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20000105_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20060630_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20090916 - silicate
All offsets - but the one based on 49UP1999 (not uploaded) - are within the
acceptable range. The uncertainty of the individual offsets is relatively high
though. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:18:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
318M20040615_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
32MW19890206_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19990804_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20000105_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20060418_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20070117_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20060630_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20090916 - oxygen
The uncertainty is too high to give any robust conclusion. Especially in the
northernmost part close to Japan the natural variability is dominating the
crossover results. Nonetheless, the absolute weighted mean is within the
acceptable range and the more reliable crossovers, e.g. UP2010 ,too. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 8 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20090916 - ph
All offsets have standard deviations in the order of 0.025, i.e. no real
conclusion can be drawn form these. Further, only one significant crossover for
the calculated TA data is given, i.e. no robust interconsistency check (type 3)
can be made. Not enough for a 2nd QC.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:18:39 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - silicate
All offsets - but the one based on 49UP1999 (not uploaded) - are within the
acceptable range. The uncertainty of the individual offsets is relatively high
though. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:18:20 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - salinity
The uncertainty is too high to give any robust conclusion. Nonetheless, the
absolute weighted mean is within the acceptable range and the (a bit) more
reliable crossovers, e.g. UP2010 ,too.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:18:05 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - phosphate
The great majority of the offsets is within the acceptable range. Further,
strong variations and the uncertainty are striking. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:48 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - nitrate
The great majority of the offsets is within the acceptable range. Most
crossovers have a weighted mean offset of above 1.01 though. Nonetheless, the
uncertainty is quite high due to the shallow data, i.e. high standard
deviations. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:33 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - oxygen
The uncertainty is too high to give any robust conclusion. Especially in the
northernmost part close to Japan the natural variability is dominating the
crossover results. Nonetheless, the absolute weighted mean is within the
acceptable range and the more reliable crossovers, e.g. UP2010 ,too. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:17:16 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - tco2
Only 3 crossovers present. All of them indicate too high concentrations but all
share large uncertainties too (order of +/- 10)! Further, the high offsets
result mostly because of one profile with high concentrations. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-19 14:16:53 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20090916 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09; Section:PT; Carbon PI:Shinya Minato;
Hydrography PI:Shinya Minato; Oxygen PI:Shinya Minato; Nutrients PI:Shinya
Minato; Organic PI:Masao Ishii; Carbon Isotope PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments