Cruise: 49UP20100514 (dataset:GLODAPv2.2019.NEW) Data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Synonyms (including errata!) for this cruise: rf201003; rf201003; 49UP20100514; non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09;
IMPORTANT information for GLODAP Reference Group Editors: This adjustment is a published version for GLODAPv2.2019!
Please wait while loading list of related files
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
Redfield.png | View | ||
tracer.png | View |
- no files! -
Plot/Data files re. Parameter(s) (select parameter on left side to view!):
alkalinity:6
cfc11:1
cfc12:1
cruise:2
nitrate:12
oxygen:12
ph:6
phosphate:12
salinity:12
silicate:11
tco2:7
- no files! -
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49HG19980812_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/salinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by salinity in subject)
49UP20100514 - salinity
The crossover analysis is of very limited meaning given the shallow depth, i.e.
high standard deviations. The very few crossovers with reliable offsets, e.g.
32501988, RY1995 or UP2010, indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20000620_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/tco2!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by tco2 in subject)
49UP20100514 - tco2
5 out of 6 crossovers indicate slightly too high concentrations but within the
acceptable range. Not enough evidence for such a small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:33:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/alkalinity!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by alkalinity in subject)
49UP20100514 - alkalinity
4 out of 5 weighted mean offsets are clearly within the acceptable range. The
one based on K61994 shows a relatively strong negative offset but also shows the
highest standard deviation. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:33:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
49HG19971110_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49K619940107_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/ph!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by ph in subject)
49UP20100514 - ph
Changed to 0 in Seattle, below threshold
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2018-09-27 00:35:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - ph
All five crossovers indcate a too low value. However, the most recent ones,
NZ2005 and UP2010 show the lowest offsets (roughly -0.009). Further, the
interconsistency check (type 2) also indicates a slightly too low value (mean
offset of -0.0096) but the uncertainty is high again. Given that both analyses
agree very well on the latter mean offset adjust accordingly.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:36:40 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - phosphate
All offsets - but one - are within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49HG19980812_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/nitrate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by nitrate in subject)
49UP20100514 - nitrate
All offsets - but the one based on K61994 - are within the acceptable range.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49HG19980812_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/phosphate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by phosphate in subject)
49UP20100514 - phosphate
All offsets - but one - are within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/silicate!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by silicate in subject)
49UP20100514 - silicate
The great majority of the crossovers indicate too high concentrations (roughly
2%) as also reflected in the absolute mean. Only one offset is below 1…
Nevertheless, standard deviations are large as is the natural variability in
this region. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:36:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
325019850330_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49HG19980812_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20050525_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49NZ20051031_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19940707_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49RY19951115_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20060614_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20070424_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UF20080422_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20080122_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
49UP20100706_Xover.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View | |
Xresults.png | [autogenerated from RC_Nico/oxygen!] |
View |
View comment(s) (filtered by oxygen in subject)
49UP20100514 - oxygen
The crossover analysis is of very limited meaning given the shallow depth, i.e.
high standard deviations. The very few crossovers with reliable offsets, e.g.
32501988, RY1995 or UP2010, indicate slightly too high concentrations… Either
flag it -888 or keep it as is.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
CFC-12-saturation.png | View |
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc12 in subject)
49UP20100514 - cfc12
Only three stations with surface samples. These actually show a large
variability and oversaturation. However, the fit with CFC_11 data is nice.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:37:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Filename: | Comment: | Action | |
---|---|---|---|
CFC-11-saturation.png | View |
View comment(s) (filtered by cfc11 in subject)
49UP20100514 - cfc11
Only three stations with surface samples. These actually show a large
variability and oversaturation. However, the fit with CFC_12 data is nice.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:37:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
View 12 comment(s) (Lists all comments)
49UP20100514 - ph
Changed to 0 in Seattle, below threshold
Posted by are.olsen@uib.no on 2018-09-27 00:35:56 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - cfc11
Only three stations with surface samples. These actually show a large
variability and oversaturation. However, the fit with CFC_12 data is nice.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:37:50 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - cfc12
Only three stations with surface samples. These actually show a large
variability and oversaturation. However, the fit with CFC_11 data is nice.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:37:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - ph
All five crossovers indcate a too low value. However, the most recent ones,
NZ2005 and UP2010 show the lowest offsets (roughly -0.009). Further, the
interconsistency check (type 2) also indicates a slightly too low value (mean
offset of -0.0096) but the uncertainty is high again. Given that both analyses
agree very well on the latter mean offset adjust accordingly.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:36:40 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - silicate
The great majority of the crossovers indicate too high concentrations (roughly
2%) as also reflected in the absolute mean. Only one offset is below 1…
Nevertheless, standard deviations are large as is the natural variability in
this region. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:36:02 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - salinity
The crossover analysis is of very limited meaning given the shallow depth, i.e.
high standard deviations. The very few crossovers with reliable offsets, e.g.
32501988, RY1995 or UP2010, indicate accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:47 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - phosphate
All offsets - but one - are within the acceptable range. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:34 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - nitrate
All offsets - but the one based on K61994 - are within the acceptable range.
Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:23 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - oxygen
The crossover analysis is of very limited meaning given the shallow depth, i.e.
high standard deviations. The very few crossovers with reliable offsets, e.g.
32501988, RY1995 or UP2010, indicate slightly too high concentrations… Either
flag it -888 or keep it as is.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:35:14 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - alkalinity
4 out of 5 weighted mean offsets are clearly within the acceptable range. The
one based on K61994 shows a relatively strong negative offset but also shows the
highest standard deviation. Accurate data. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:33:09 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - tco2
5 out of 6 crossovers indicate slightly too high concentrations but within the
acceptable range. Not enough evidence for such a small adjustment. Maintain.
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-21 14:33:01 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
49UP20100514 - initialized
non-GO-SHIP but on GO-SHIP line:P09; Carbon PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Hydrography
PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Oxygen PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Nutrients PI:Hitomi Kamiya; CFCs
PI:Hitomi Kamiya; Carbon Isotope PI:Masao Ishii
Posted by nlange@geomar.de on 2018-09-04 08:19:35 UTC for data product: GLODAPv2.2019, v2.2020, v2.2021, v2.2022, v2.2023
Hide comments